Zangezur Corridor

The Zangezur Corridor is one of the most discussed geopolitical projects in the South Caucasus, sparking intense debates among Azerbaijan, Armenia, Turkey, Iran, and other countries. This transportation route aims to connect mainland Azerbaijan with its Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic through Armenia’s Syunik Province. The project holds strategic importance for the region, influencing economics, security, and international relations. This article explores the history, significance, and latest developments surrounding the Zangezur Corridor.

History and Origin of the Concept

The idea of the Zangezur Corridor emerged in the 1990s following the First Karabakh War, which disrupted transportation links between Azerbaijan and Nakhchivan. During Soviet times, this route operated via the Transcaucasian Railway and highways connecting Baku to Nakhchivan through Syunik. After the Second Karabakh War in 2020 and the signing of a trilateral agreement between Azerbaijan, Armenia, and Russia on November 10, 2020, the issue of restoring transport links became a priority. The agreement called for unblocking communications, giving impetus to discussions about the Zangezur Corridor.

The corridor envisions a 40-km road and railway through Armenia’s Syunik Province, from Agbend in Azerbaijan to Ordubad in Nakhchivan. Azerbaijan and Turkey actively promote the project, seeing it as a means to integrate the Turkic world and enhance international trade routes. However, Armenia opposes the term “corridor,” viewing it as a threat to its sovereignty, and proposes an alternative concept called the “Crossroads of Peace.”

Geopolitical and Economic Significance

The Zangezur Corridor is strategically vital for Azerbaijan, as it provides direct land access to Nakhchivan, eliminating the need for detour routes through Iran. The project integrates with the Trans-Caspian International Transport Route (Middle Corridor), reducing cargo transit time from China to Europe by 40% and increasing capacity to 15 million tons annually. For Turkey, the corridor opens access to Central Asia, strengthening its regional influence. Economic benefits include the development of logistics, customs centers, and commercial zones, which could boost trade turnover.

However, the project raises concerns in Armenia and Iran. Yerevan fears losing control over parts of its territory, while Tehran sees the corridor as a threat to its influence in the South Caucasus and alternative routes through its territory. Russia, tasked with ensuring the corridor’s security under the 2020 agreement, supports the project but insists on preserving Armenia’s sovereignty over the route.

Latest News

In 2025, the Zangezur Corridor remains a focal point. In August 2025, the leaders of Azerbaijan and Armenia, mediated by U.S. President Donald Trump, signed a preliminary agreement in the White House, dubbed the “Trump Route for Peace and Prosperity.” The agreement outlines a transport route through Syunik under Armenian law. The U.S. expressed readiness to lease the corridor for 100 years for infrastructure work, prompting protests from Iran, which called it an “American-Zionist plan.” Azerbaijan has completed 70% of the road construction on its territory, and construction of a bridge over the Araz River near Agbend has begun.

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan emphasizes the importance of transit revenues for Armenia’s economy but insists on full sovereignty over the route. Iran has proposed an alternative Araz Corridor through its territory to maintain its influence. Meanwhile, Turkey views the project as key to integrating the Turkic world.

Conclusion

The Zangezur Corridor is not only a transportation project but also a geopolitical nexus where the interests of Azerbaijan, Armenia, Turkey, Iran, Russia, and the U.S. converge. Its implementation could transform trade routes and the balance of power in the South Caucasus but requires addressing the sovereignty concerns of all parties. In 2025, the project is in active negotiations, and its success hinges on the ability of nations to find a compromise.